![]() That way you can remove work from the host machine and just take the HDMI or DP output, send it through a piece of hardware, and then send that stream to the iPP. I posted this before but the real solution is to involve dedicated video capture hardware. Still adds 30ms of latency, but that's way better than Astropad on any setup I've seen. You can get this to work pretty well in Steam Home Streaming, but it requires a solid desktop as the host with a modern GPU that supports something like ShadowPlay. The issues must be on the host end, where the screen capture and encoding is going on. You could stream multiple BR videos simultaneously with 35 MB/sec. The USB 2.0 data rate should be more than sufficient. (It's a great app!) Perhaps when we're able to access those promised USB 3.0 transfer speeds, we'll see some greater improvements in that vein…? I work with large canvases at a minimum of 300 DPI, so it's honestly pretty impressive that the Astropad devs have been able to achieve as much as they have. This effect is very easy for me to replicate by simply clicking a drop-down menu, but any large enough stroke will do it. That said, I'll be interested to see how the API and software will continue to evolve over the next year or so!Īgreed on all counts! The response is reasonably quick on my 2015 MBP, but it's far from the instantaneous response of a traditional display such as a Cintiq, and there's still an appreciable amount of "mosaic effect" that occurs when the source machine is trying to push a lot of pixel changes very quickly. I think iPP may be able to displace Wacom tablets for a certain proportion of users, but I don't feel it's quite there yet for many others. I've decided to keep a Cintiq as my main workhorse and am still deciding if the iPad Pro will fit into my workflow in a supplemental role. This is my thread on the Astropad forums: It should be noted that there are bugs, as well, which may or may not affect you depending upon your preferred type(s) of mark-making. Click to expand.Agreed on all counts! The response is reasonably quick on my 2015 MBP, but it's far from the instantaneous response of a traditional display such as a Cintiq, and there's still an appreciable amount of "mosaic effect" that occurs when the source machine is trying to push a lot of pixel changes very quickly.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |